Chelsea have been held to a 0-0 draw by Bournemouth, lacking out on three factors for one more week.

In a traditional “bore draw” sport between Bournemouth and Chelsea, there have been possibilities for each side to win the sport, nonetheless significantly Chelsea who had 14 pictures with 6 heading in the right direction, and failing to attain.

Learn on for our Chelsea participant rankings as we check out who didn’t carry out for the Blues, and who did a job…

Robert Sanchez – 7.5 – Sanchez was one of many solely positives on this sport for Chelsea, as he made a number of massive stops to maintain them within the sport, and he additionally commanded his space very effectively, gathering crosses for the Blues.

Levi Colwill – 6 – Colwill taking part in on this left again place versus his acquainted centre again spot, he was good for Chelsea in construct up and stored the ball effectively, nonetheless not a lot got here down his aspect defensively and he wasn’t overly examined in 1v1 huge areas. He additionally had a objective disallowed within the second half for offside.

Thiago Silva – 6 – Silva once more was comparatively untested, stored his place effectively and was getting on the ball greater than his centre again associate Disasi for construct up from the again. He performed probably the most passes for Chelsea (79) and tried probably the most (83).

Axel Disasi – 7 – Disasi was stable defensively and was being aggressive with the Bournemouth centre ahead Solanke. He was taking part in contact tight to the ahead and utilizing his physicality to muscle him off the ball and win his duels. He additionally made 4 clearances, 4 blocked pictures and 1 sort out, which was probably the most defensive actions made by a Chelsea participant within the sport.

Malo Gusto – 7 – Gusto supplied good attacking risk overlapping on the best aspect, attending to the byline on quite a few events and placing crosses into the field. These almost resulted in targets for the Blues, and his persistence to affix the assault with Sterling on the best aspect helped Chelsea create possibilities, however they only couldn’t flip them into targets.

chelsea gusto 2023 24
Malo Gusto in motion for Chelsea

Lesley Ugochukwu – 6.5 – Ugochukwu was stable in the midst of the park, making his first Premier League begin since becoming a member of this summer season within the absence of Moises Caicedo. He used his bodily body effectively to guard the defence at occasions, and was pivotal in construct as much as recycle the ball from left to proper. He additionally made a couple of highly effective runs from deep midfield to get Chelsea out and beat the preliminary press.

Enzo Fernandez – 5.5 – Fernandez struggled to get into this sport, with Bournemouth man Lewis Prepare dinner given the job of denying Fernandez to get on the ball in superior areas. He was restricted to deeper touches and faster passes, versus his regular inventive freedom the place he dictates the sport.

Conor Gallagher – 7 – Chelsea captain on the day, Gallagher was all over the place in midfield, and appeared to have more room to function because of Bournemouth’s obsession to cease Fernandez. Gallagher labored onerous within the center, was providing an out ball for Chelsea (particularly within the first half) and may have scored a objective after moving into an awesome space a number of occasions within the field.

Raheem Sterling – 5.5 – Sterling had a sport the place he discovered all the best areas, however couldn’t discover the ultimate ball. He had a couple of pictures astray and made a couple of poor passes within the closing third which slowed down or stopped an assault. He did hit the woodwork from an excellent freekick, nonetheless it simply wasn’t his day for the ultimate touches.

Mykhaylo Mudryk – 6.5 – Mudryk was optimistic all through, eager to get into harmful areas and put balls into the field. On a couple of events, Mudryk bought the beating of the fullback and located a great ball into the field however once more the shortage of ruthlessness for Chelsea harm them, as they couldn’t end any of those alternatives being created.

Nicolas Jackson – 4 – Not an awesome efficiency for Jackson, who has began comparatively effectively for Chelsea since becoming a member of. Some poor touches in and across the 18 yard field, and some poor pictures in areas he may have performed higher, particularly when he’s the primary man for the Blues upfront. Jackson did strike the submit within the first half, however apart from that, he didn’t come shut.

Subs: Palmer 5, Chilwell 4, Maatsen 4.5.

Source link